Scandal that began with surveillance by ‘NOTW’ The Mail on Sunday said it would be defending the action vigorously. The Duke and Duchess have filed a High Court claim against the Mail on Sunday, and its parent company Associated Newspapers, over the alleged misuse of private information, infringement of copyright and breach of the Data Protection Act 2018.
I lost my mother and now I watch my wife falling victim to the same powerful forces.” “I’ve seen what happens when someone I love is commoditised to the point that they are no longer treated or seen as a real person. To stand back and do nothing would be contrary to everything we believe in. He continued: “I have been a silent witness to her private suffering for too long. One day’s coverage is no longer tomorrow’s chip-paper.” Because in today’s digital age, press fabrications are repurposed as truth across the globe. He added: “There is a human cost to this relentless propaganda, specifically when it is knowingly false and malicious, and though we have continued to put on a brave face – as so many of you can relate to – I cannot begin to describe how painful it has been. In his statement he said: “My wife has become one of the latest victims of a British tabloid press that wages campaigns against individuals with no thought to the consequences – a ruthless campaign that has escalated over the past year, throughout her pregnancy and while raising our newborn son.” The Duke and Duchess of Sussex also launched legal action this week against the Mail On Sunday (Photo: Dominic Lipinski/PA Wire) Prince Harry released an explosive statement on Tuesday night about the British tabloid press, in which he set out his reasons for suing the Mail on Sunday, published by Associated Newspapers, over the way it had reported on his wife Meghan Markle. The palace said no details could be made available as the claims are not yet public. Buckingham Palace sources confirmed that claims have been filed on behalf of The Duke of Sussex at the High Court regarding the alleged illegal interception of voicemail messages.
0 kommentar(er)
